|
 | Hi Anonymous
|  | 免費會員登記
|  | 如有任何疑問，
按此可直接與船主聯系。 |
歡 迎 訂 閱 「HKDB」會 員 2023- 2024 年 費 計 劃 將 於 現 時 開 始 接 受 註 冊 ， 年 費 費 用 為 港 幣 1,700 元 正， 人 民 幣 1,600 元 正 。
月 費 費 用 為 港 幣 350 元 正， 人 民 幣 300 元 正 。
各 會 員 可 以 經 Fax 或 網 上 申 請，方 法 請 查 看 登 記 辦 法
| |
|
|
|
|  |
|
| Author |
R9 浦紅之友及四季叻 |
MML
註冊於: 05/04/2003
發帖數目: 5650
|  發表於: 2007-02-04 on 18:27
Quote:
|
On 2007-02-04 18:14, liup wrote:
Quote:
|
On 2007-02-04 05:15, liup wrote:
今場有過半數馬匹(共8隻)曾在上月R292同場角逐, 唔知今賽F4有冇咁簡單, 由該賽頭二至五名(紅辣椒,赤胆福星,浦紅之友,四季叻)包辨呢, 照睇F4腳拖埋該場既第六七名(金碧滿湖,康樂神駒)已足夠有餘. 
|
|
果然真係咁簡單, 終可Q, 單T 及 F4齊收, 本利歸還. ^_^
MML, 原來"浦紅之友"及"四季叻"都只不過係半斤八兩咋, 今次"浦紅之友"再fight back唔到la.
|
|
步速走位之故啫, 跑多幾米, 似乎"浦紅之友"可以再 fight back 到。
不過韋達已經聽哂我嘅 riding instruction 架啦, 輸少少無話可說。
(我估佢擒晚偷睇咗我給朋友嘅 email :
Between 拔尖兒 and 浦紅之友, perhaps the former is more worthy of backing. Besides the better odd, it is because of the poor statistical support of leading horses at ST-2000. Large majority of winners at ST-2000 in recent seasons were not leading horses. Those led to win mostly relied on pace advantage or track bias!
Perhaps 浦紅之友 will not take the lead tomorrow as Whyte can easily put it in box seat. This horse just raced for 3 times, I am not sure what will be the best tactics....)
亦因如此, 我最後補充了"希望 P 接近 2倍, 可以做變倍器 la.", 可惜太多大水喉射落黎, place 冇啖好食。 
|
MML
註冊於: 05/04/2003
發帖數目: 5650
| 發表於: 2007-02-04 on 18:32
[quote]
On 2007-02-04 18:27, MML wrote:
Quote:
|
.....
不過韋達已經聽哂我嘅 riding instruction 架啦, 輸少少無話可說。
(我估佢擒晚偷睇咗我給朋友嘅 email :
Between 拔尖兒 and 浦紅之友, perhaps the former is more worthy of backing. Besides the better odd, it is because of the poor statistical support of leading horses at ST-2000. Large majority of winners at ST-2000 in recent seasons were not leading horses. Those led to win mostly relied on pace advantage or track bias!
Perhaps 浦紅之友 will not take the lead tomorrow as Whyte can easily put it in box seat. This horse just raced for 3 times, I am not sure what will be the best tactics....)
亦因如此, 我最後補充了"希望 P 接近 2倍, 可以做變倍器 la.", 可惜太多大水喉射落黎, place 冇啖好食。
|
|
I wrote in another email :
{.......R9 (ST-2000, Cl-3)
浦紅之友 - it was the only front-running survivor last time in R292 (ST-2000). Moreover, it tried to fight back near the finish post. It showed good heart despite only the 3rd run in HK. Unfortunately, there were seldom leading horses won at ST-2000 in the past. Hope Whyte would put it in box seat and dash to win after the final 600m or 400m.....}
Whyte really started to run from 600m! ^_^
|
liup
註冊於: 13/09/2003
發帖數目: 2628 | 發表於: 2007-02-04 on 18:34
[quote]
On 2007-02-03 17:19, MML wrote:
Quote:
|
On 2007-02-03 16:11, liup wrote:
Quote:
|
請問在此情況下應如何解讀及推測幕後鬥志, 和怎樣決定投注策略呢?
(1) 幕後鬥志如虹, 做投注重心; 或
(2) 幕後喜冷嫌熱, 避之則吉; 定係
(3) 幕後....
|
|
我都願聞其詳, 會否出現冷就嫌冇飛, 熱就不值搏等問題呢？
|
|
今次個答案好似係 (1).
|
MML
註冊於: 05/04/2003
發帖數目: 5650
| 發表於: 2007-02-04 on 18:41
[quote]
On 2007-02-04 18:34, liup wrote:
Quote:
|
On 2007-02-03 17:19, MML wrote:
Quote:
|
On 2007-02-03 16:11, liup wrote:
Quote:
|
請問在此情況下應如何解讀及推測幕後鬥志, 和怎樣決定投注策略呢?
(1) 幕後鬥志如虹, 做投注重心; 或
(2) 幕後喜冷嫌熱, 避之則吉; 定係
(3) 幕後....
|
|
我都願聞其詳, 會否出現冷就嫌冇飛, 熱就不值搏等問題呢？
|
|
今次個答案好似係 (1).
|
|
邊有咁易捉吖, 每次唔同答案架。
|
賽馬救世協會hkhorsecharity
註冊於: 05/12/2006
發帖數目: 56 | 發表於: 2007-02-04 on 19:16
勁呀！呢度成日都開口中，但點解我永遠都係事後先睇到咁後知後覺？！ 
|
JimmyMa
註冊於: 29/09/2006
發帖數目: 5345
| 發表於: 2007-02-04 on 22:23
Quote:
|
On 2007-02-04 18:27, MML wrote:
Quote:
|
On 2007-02-04 18:14, liup wrote:
Quote:
|
On 2007-02-04 05:15, liup wrote:
今場有過半數馬匹(共8隻)曾在上月R292同場角逐, 唔知今賽F4有冇咁簡單, 由該賽頭二至五名(紅辣椒,赤胆福星,浦紅之友,四季叻)包辨呢, 照睇F4腳拖埋該場既第六七名(金碧滿湖,康樂神駒)已足夠有餘.
|
|
果然真係咁簡單, 終可Q, 單T 及 F4齊收, 本利歸還. ^_^
MML, 原來"浦紅之友"及"四季叻"都只不過係半斤八兩咋, 今次"浦紅之友"再fight back唔到la.
|
|
步速走位之故啫, 跑多幾米, 似乎"浦紅之友"可以再 fight back 到。
不過韋達已經聽哂我嘅 riding instruction 架啦, 輸少少無話可說。
(我估佢擒晚偷睇咗我給朋友嘅 email :
Between 拔尖兒 and 浦紅之友, perhaps the former is more worthy of backing. Besides the better odd, it is because of the poor statistical support of leading horses at ST-2000. Large majority of winners at ST-2000 in recent seasons were not leading horses. Those led to win mostly relied on pace advantage or track bias!
Perhaps 浦紅之友 will not take the lead tomorrow as Whyte can easily put it in box seat. This horse just raced for 3 times, I am not sure what will be the best tactics....)
亦因如此, 我最後補充了"希望 P 接近 2倍, 可以做變倍器 la.", 可惜太多大水喉射落黎, place 冇啖好食。
|
|
如果跑多幾米, 好似康樂神駒W機會多o的喎,
隻馬成条直路冇位上. 隻甫紅之友輸左580萬W, 走番亇大熱P, 算有交待啦.
cmyk兄, 今次我批的死 火馬:
山東好馬, 浦紅之友, 寳樹聚盈,
三大熱門, 只有浦紅之友入P, 都算有交待啦!
將軍 P 都有30幾元.
|
cmyk
註冊於: 10/01/2005
發帖數目: 641 | 發表於: 2007-02-05 on 03:45
Quote:
|
On 2007-02-04 18:14, liup wrote:
Quote:
|
On 2007-02-04 05:15, liup wrote:
今場有過半數馬匹(共8隻)曾在上月R292同場角逐, 唔知今賽F4有冇咁簡單, 由該賽頭二至五名(紅辣椒,赤胆福星,浦紅之友,四季叻)包辨呢, 照睇F4腳拖埋該場既第六七名(金碧滿湖,康樂神駒)已足夠有餘.
|
|
果然真係咁簡單, 終可Q, 單T 及 F4齊收, 本利歸還. ^_^
MML, 原來"浦紅之友"及"四季叻"都只不過係半斤八兩咋, 今次"浦紅之友"再fight back唔到la.
|
|
好彩今次"浦紅之友"再fight back唔到la,我跟足二至七名(紅辣椒,赤胆福星,浦紅之友,四季叻,金碧滿湖,康樂神駒)"浦紅之友"擺第二 
|
liup
註冊於: 13/09/2003
發帖數目: 2628 | 發表於: 2007-02-05 on 07:43
Quote:
|
On 2007-02-05 03:45, cmyk wrote:
好彩今次"浦紅之友"再fight back唔到la,我跟足二至七名(紅辣椒,赤胆福星,浦紅之友,四季叻,金碧滿湖,康樂神駒)"浦紅之友"擺第二
|
|
衹要"浦紅之友"跑第二, 你條三重彩就真係好隱陣喎, 連第四五名都中埋.
|
MML
註冊於: 05/04/2003
發帖數目: 5650
| 發表於: 2007-02-05 on 15:51
Quote:
|
On 2007-02-05 07:43, liup wrote:
Quote:
|
On 2007-02-05 03:45, cmyk wrote:
好彩今次"浦紅之友"再fight back唔到la,我跟足二至七名(紅辣椒,赤胆福星,浦紅之友,四季叻,金碧滿湖,康樂神駒)"浦紅之友"擺第二
|
|
衹要"浦紅之友"跑第二, 你條三重彩就真係好隱陣喎, 連第四五名都中埋.
|
|
我諗如果"浦紅之友"跑第一, cmyk兄就會 post 另一條行頭拖, 5連環都中嘅飛架啦。^^
|
cmyk
註冊於: 10/01/2005
發帖數目: 641 | 發表於: 2007-02-05 on 16:28
Quote:
|
On 2007-02-05 15:51, MML wrote:
我諗如果"浦紅之友"跑第一, cmyk兄就會 post 另一條行頭拖, 5連環都中?飛架啦。^^
|
|
MML兄估中真係有另一條飛，但係擺"浦紅之友"第三名
因睇左呢一句『"浦紅"而家冷番些少, 希望 P 接近 2倍, 可以做變倍器 la』同埋"浦紅"太熱啦，如擺"第一"三重彩唔好分
|
|
  
|
|
|
|
登入
會員登記
